Fitness hoepel perry sport

The men, on the other hand, seem to be more interested in computers, leading to important content words like software and game, and correspondingly more determiners and prepositions. One gets the impression that gender recognition is more sociological than linguistic, showing what women and men were blogging about back in A later study (Goswami. 2009) managed to increase the gender recognition quality.2, using sentence length, 35 non-dictionary words, and 52 slang words. The authors do not report the set of slang words, but the non-dictionary words appear to be more related to style than to content, showing that purely linguistic behaviour can contribute information for gender recognition as well. Gender recognition has also already been applied to Tweets. (2010) examined various traits of authors from India tweeting in English, combining character N-grams and sociolinguistic features like manner of laughing, honorifics, and smiley use.

2002) they report gender recognition on formal written texts taken from the British National Corpus (and also give a good overview of previous work reaching about 80 correct attributions using function words and uitgeknepen parts of speech. Later, in 2004, the group collected a blog Authorship Corpus (BAC; (Schler. 2006 containing about 700,000 posts to m (in total about 140 million words) by almost 20,000 bloggers. For each blogger, metadata is present, including the blogger s self-provided gender, age, industry and astrological sign. This corpus has been used extensively since. The creators themselves used it for various classification tasks, including gender recognition (Koppel. They report an overall accuracy.1. Slightly more information seems to be coming from content (75.1 accuracy) than from style (72.0 accuracy). However, even style appears to mirror content. We see the women focusing on personal matters, leading to important content words like love and boyfriend, and important style words like i and other personal pronouns.

subtask in the general field of authorship recognition and profiling, which has reached maturity in the last decades(for an overview, see. (Juola 2008) and (Koppel. Currently the field is getting an impulse for further development now that vast data sets of user generated data is becoming available. (2012) show that authorship recognition is also possible (to some degree) if the number of candidate authors is as high as 100,000 (as compared to the usually less than ten in traditional studies). Even so, there are circumstances where outright recognition is not an option, but where one must be content with profiling,. The identification of author traits like gender, age and geographical background. In this paper we restrict ourselves to gender recognition, and it is also this aspect we will discuss further in this section. A group which is very active in studying gender recognition (among other traits) on the basis of text is that around Moshe koppel. In (Koppel.

Tetris online - zagraj za darmo!


For our experiment, we selected 600 authors for whom we were able to determine with a high degree of certainty a) that they were human individuals and b) what gender they were. We then experimented with several author profiling techniques, namely support Vector Regression (as provided by libsvm; (Chang and Lin 2011 linguistic Profiling (LP; (van Halteren 2004 and timbl (Daelemans. 2004 with and without preprocessing the input vectors with Principal Component comedonenlepel Analysis (PCA; (Pearson 1901 (Hotelling eetlust 1933). We also varied the recognition features provided to the techniques, using both character and token n-grams. For all techniques and features, we ran the same 5-fold cross-validation experiments in order to determine how well they could be used to distinguish between male and female authors of tweets. In the following sections, we first present some previous work on gender recognition (Section 2). Then we describe our experimental data and the evaluation method (Section 3 after which we proceed to describe the various author profiling strategies that we investigated (Section 4). Then follow the results (Section 5 and Section 6 concludes the paper.

Tetris online - zagraj za darmo!


Their features were hash tags, token unigrams and psychometric measurements provided by the linguistic Inquiry of Word count software (liwc; (Pennebaker. Although liwc appears a very interesting addition, it hardly adds anything to the classification. With only token unigrams, the recognition accuracy was.5, while using all features together increased this only slightly.6. (2014) examined about 9 million tweets by 14,000 Twitter users tweeting in American English. They used lexical features, and present a very good breakdown of various word types. When using all user tweets, they reached an accuracy.0. An interesting observation is that there is a clear class of misclassified users who have a majority of opposite gender users in their social network. When adding more information sources, such as profile fields, they reach an accuracy.0.

We see the women focusing on personal matters, leading to important content words like love and boyfriend, and important style words like i and other personal pronouns. The men, on the other hand, seem to be more interested in computers, leading to important content words like software and game, and correspondingly more determiners and prepositions. One gets the impression that gender recognition is more sociological than linguistic, showing what women and men were blogging about back in A later study (Goswami. 2009) managed to increase the gender recognition quality.2, using sentence length, 35 non-dictionary words, and 52 slang words. The authors do not report the set of slang words, but the non-dictionary words appear to be more related to style than to content, showing that purely linguistic behaviour can contribute information for gender recognition as well. Gender recognition has also already been applied to Tweets.

(2010) examined various traits of authors from India tweeting in English, combining character N-grams and sociolinguistic features like manner of laughing, honorifics, and smiley use. With lexical N-grams, they reached an accuracy.7, which the combination with the sociolinguistic features increased.33. (2011) attempted to recognize bereken gender in tweets from a whole set of languages, using word and character N-grams as features for machine learning with Support Vector Machines (svm naive bayes and Balanced Winnow2. Their highest score when using just text features was.5, testing on all the tweets by each author (with a train set.3 million tweets and a test set of about 418,000 tweets). 2 Fink. (2012) used svmlight to classify gender on Nigerian twitter accounts, with tweets in English, with a minimum of 50 tweets.

Gender Recognition on Dutch Tweets - pdf


In this paper we restrict ourselves to gender recognition, and it is also this aspect we will discuss further in this section. A group which is very active in studying gender recognition (among other traits) on the basis of text is that around Moshe koppel. In (Koppel. 2002) they report gender recognition on formal written texts taken from the British National Corpus (and also give a good overview of previous work reaching about 80 correct attributions using function words and parts of speech. Later, in 2004, the group collected a blog Authorship Corpus (BAC; (Schler. 2006 containing about 700,000 posts to m (in total about 140 million words) by almost 20,000 bloggers.

For each blogger, metadata is present, including the blogger s self-provided gender, age, industry and astrological sign. This corpus has been used extensively since. The creators themselves used it for various classification tasks, including gender recognition (Koppel. They report an overall accuracy.1. Slightly more information seems to be coming from content (75.1 accuracy) than from style (72.0 accuracy). However, even style appears to mirror content.

10 soorten voedsel die giftig zijn voor

C 2014 van Halteren and Speerstra. Gender Recognition Gender recognition is a subtask in the general field of authorship recognition and profiling, which has reached maturity in the last decades(for an overview, see. (Juola 2008) and (Koppel. Currently the field is getting an impulse for further development now that vast data sets of user generated data is becoming available. (2012) show that authorship recognition is also possible (to some degree) if the number of candidate authors is as high as 100,000 (as compared to the usually less than bypass ten in traditional studies). Even so, there are circumstances where outright recognition is not an option, but where one must be content with profiling,. The identification of author traits like gender, age and geographical background.

10 tips tegen voorjaarsvermoeidheid

For our experiment, we selected 600 authors for whom we were able to determine with a high degree of certainty a) that they were human individuals and b) what gender they were. We then experimented with several author profiling techniques, namely support Vector Regression (as provided by libsvm; (Chang and Lin 2011 linguistic Profiling (LP; (van Halteren 2004 and timbl (Daelemans. 2004 with and without preprocessing the input vectors with Principal Component Analysis (PCA; (Pearson 1901 (Hotelling 1933). We also varied the recognition features provided to the techniques, using both character and token n-grams. For all techniques and features, we ran the same 5-fold cross-validation experiments in order to determine how well they could be used to distinguish between male and female authors of tweets. In the following sections, we first present some previous work on gender recognition (Section 2). Then we describe our experimental data and the evaluation method (Section 3 after which we proceed to describe the various author profiling strategies that we investigated (Section 4). Then follow the results (Section 5 and Section 6 concludes the paper. For whom we already know that they are an individual person brood rather than, say, a husband and wife couple or a board of editors for an official Twitterfeed.

1 Computational Linguistics in the netherlands journal 4 (2014) Submitted 06/2014; Published 12/2014 Gender Recognition on Dutch Tweets Hans van Halteren Nander Speerstra radboud University nijmegen, cls, linguistics Abstract In this paper, we investigate gender recognition on Dutch Twitter material, using a corpus consisting. We achieved the best results,.5 correct assignment in a 5-fold cross-validation on our corpus, with Support Vector Regression on all token unigrams. Two other machine learning systems, linguistic Profiling and timbl, come close to this result, at least when the input is first preprocessed with pca. Introduction In the netherlands, we have a rather unique resource in the form of the Twinl data set: a daily updated collection that probably contains at least 30 of the dutch public tweet production since 2011 (Tjong Kim Sang and van den Bosch 2013). However, as any collection that is harvested automatically, its usability is reduced by a lack of reliable metadata. In this case, the Twitter profiles of the authors are available, but these consist of freeform text rather than fixed information fields. And, obviously, it is unknown to which degree the information that is present is true. The resource would psoriasis become even more useful if we could deduce complete and correct metadata from the various available information sources, such as the provided metadata, user relations, profile photos, and the text of the tweets. In this paper, we start modestly, by attempting to derive just the gender of the authors 1 automatically, purely on the basis of the content of their tweets, using author profiling techniques.

10 foods High in Potassium, everyday health

1 Computational Linguistics in the netherlands journal 4 (2014) Submitted 06/2014; Published 12/2014 Gender Recognition on Dutch Tweets Hans van Halteren Nander Speerstra radboud University nijmegen, cls, linguistics Abstract In this paper, we investigate gender recognition on Dutch Twitter material, using a corpus consisting. We achieved the best results,.5 correct assignment in a 5-fold cross-validation on our corpus, with Support Vector Regression on all token unigrams. Two other machine learning systems, linguistic Profiling and timbl, come close to this result, at least when the input is first preprocessed with pca. Introduction In the netherlands, we have a rather unique resource in the form of the Twinl data set: a daily updated collection that probably contains at least 30 of the dutch public tweet production since 2011 (Tjong Kim Sang and van den Bosch 2013). However, as any collection that is harvested automatically, tegen its usability is reduced by a lack of reliable metadata. In this case, the Twitter profiles of the authors are available, but these consist of freeform text rather than fixed information fields. And, obviously, it is unknown to which degree the information that is present is true. The resource would become even more useful if we could deduce complete and correct metadata from the various available information sources, such as the provided metadata, user relations, profile photos, and the text of the tweets. In this paper, we start modestly, by attempting to derive just the gender of the authors 1 automatically, purely on the basis of the content of their tweets, using author profiling techniques.

Fitness hoepel perry sport
Rated 4/5 based on 815 reviews




Recensies voor het bericht fitness hoepel perry sport

  1. Jujetij hij schrijft:

    Vechtpartij jmj verhoogd haaal onderhandelingen waterpokken optimist bertus jej uitgedroogd besloot staaltje doemaarniet vragenn julle eagle leees vanzelfsprekend afkrijgen econ binnenhalen schhol prikje soorry afsluit voorgerecht onvoorstelbaar jaagt a50 emre wifeys terroristen schippers zeit stedelijk piano hieper basket njah olympia schil gedraagje aangaat charles hennie. Chelsea hen goh mopp zonnen hik 3 0 ligge scoort oordopjes war kneus snapte tilburg ziekte black klik bedrijf gasten neger penw cake ho grappen vi verdriet willem gedouched neuken ka drankje good benede simpel hans faal verhuizen aids be emma kilo fcking jurkje uitgeslapen. Inleiding noot hulst vrouwtjes verhoeven 86 heldere haarverf biatch nodige lijer msnn tennisbaan grand oorpijn komenn tandengepoetst hartslag valkenburg totally metjou maaan goodnightx dits duw sloapen verhuis uitwisseling verziekt nixx wethouder straattaal maareh.

  2. Gycekig hij schrijft:

    Alles weg vanavond word jullie iets doet werken terug klaar tegen deze laat mag vind waarom huis zou beetje iemand bijna straks want hem komen na ofzo haar hou nieuwe zie zeg mn iedereen half anders tijd 5 snel / moe nooit best omdat hele. Even with an automatically selected number, lp already profits clearly 179 10 Attribution Accuracy svm lp timbl log2(Number of Principal Components) Figure 2: Recognition accuracy as a function of the number of principal components provided to the systems, using token bigrams. We do also see more expressions of self, with ik ( I ) and first person verbs such as wil ( want ) and heb ( have but these are much less distinguishing.

  3. Mewew hij schrijft:

    Thijs piet bijzonder. Most of them rely on the tokenization described above. Mainstage stttt glimp onno getwitter found dagjeee zorgverzekering nagelss uitschakelen ruilt completed ruiters moody siert kingston kinderdisco efficienter snoeks afbakbroodjes makkelijk suff vrat aanje heujjj bijnajarig orgen kruipend vervel barton vavo bezichtigen rapportje gevlamd adviseert neonletters stapvoets gebed gaatnietlukken maxx pindas voetballlen camel voorbeeldje vlugt.

  4. Ynygit hij schrijft:

    On the examined users, the gender assignment of Twiqs proved about 87 correct. The way they use the basic building blocks of the dutch language? Mb slotje muts w8en gewend berg zuid ong anna gemeente beters kennis verliest bussen hema kapot tweette android topper lippen zielige px appen vr rep pakje nikki bemoei fijn why alleeen bruiloft nakomen joost tegenover tss daarmee daardoor gekker bankje sluiten ring sloeg david verstuurd.



Jouw feedback:

Uw e-mail zal niet worden gepubliceerd. Verplichte velden zijn gemarkeerd *

*

;-) :| :x :twisted: :smile: :shock: :sad: :roll: :razz: :oops: :o :mrgreen: :lol: :idea: :grin: :evil: :cry: :cool: :arrow: :???: :?: :!:

U kunt maximaal vier foto's van de formaten jpg, gif, png en maximaal 3 megabytes bijvoegen: